how much money they los
2014年11月20日WikiLeaks releases the secret negotiated draft text for the entire TPP Trans
Some countries want more protection for geographical indications, which are rights to names based on location (like how sparkling wine is only "champagne" if it from Champagne France). The US seems not to really care about this.
It provides for a big increase in the kinds of things that can be patented in ways that could harm the pace of innovation, consumers, and smaller companies. Newly patentable things would include plants, animals, biological processes, video game rules, methods of mental processes, software itself, artwork, books, and more. The US already allows some of these, but other countries don and nobody allows patents for some of them.
There a way to re patent already known or previously patented stuff as long as you claim the stuff has a new use. The US also wants standards for granting patents to be relaxed a bit compared to many countries current requirements and patent terms to be made effectively longer by not counting cheap jerseys long delays between when the patent was first filed and when it was granted (which can take years in some cases) toward the total patent term. Some of these rules would require countries to install penalties like the US currently has, while others criminalize and penalize more severely than anyone currently does. Other countries oppose this.
Lemme know if you have any questions!
Edit: Yay, thanks for the gold! Also, edited wording and content a bit.
Here is a quick summary from what wholesale jerseys I can glean. I not a lawyer, so don hold me to it. I used the doc itself, press releases and Wikipedia to piece this together.
It first talks about what a trademark is, the use of it, well known marks.
Geographical Indication: does not count as a trademark, and you can’t falsely indicate an incorrect geographical origin. Temporary AKA temporary storage in electronic form. Currently we don’t have laws for this, meaning ISPs are not liable for infringement, nor transitory storage.
Parallel imports: Would be up to the rights holders. (Allowing for Harry Potter UK edition to be unofficially sold in the US legally, for example.)
EDIT 3 A more relevant use of this would be to outlaw Japanese imports of Anime and Manga that has not been released here, or to outlaw imported textbooks that are sold at a lower price in other countries. In the US it is currently 50 years.
Anti Circumvention: Like Cheap Jerseys for sale some US law, it would not require knowledge that you circumvented a technology measure to make you liable for infringement. It would also allow countries to outlaw anything that enabled or facilitated circumvention instead of "has the purpose of" circumvention. Circumvention is it’s own separate action. Right now it only cover sale, transfer, lease and rent. New addition may include streaming and hosting online. It’s pretty fuzzy and relates to cases which relate to cases I’ll see if I can update this.
Enforcement: It allows for statutory damages to be set up they don’t have to prove how much money they lost, they will set an amount for compensation and as a deterrent . They can also destroy any materials used to manufacture pirated/counterfeit goods. US only allows certain items to be destroyed ( ie. Molds or forms ect,) and only things that were used predominately for the manufacturing. (NOT A LAWYER, but they can take/ destroy anything you used to pirate, ie. your computer?)
Preliminary Injunctions: To be granted in 10 days, there is no need show irreparable harm.
(Typing at work, sorry for any mistakes)
EDIT 4 Additional Points (Also formatting)
A trademark can be a phrase, sign, sound or scent There is disagreement about this.
You can’t enforce a trademark that is the customary word for a good/service in the language it’s sold. (If your brand is the French word for cold water you can’t enforce that in France)
Some countries want more protection for geographical indications, which are rights to names based on location (like how sparkling wine is only "champagne" if it from Champagne France). The US seems not to really care about this.
It provides for a big increase in the kinds of things that can be patented in ways that could harm the pace of innovation, consumers, and smaller companies. Newly patentable things would include plants, animals, biological processes, video game rules, methods of mental processes, software itself, artwork, books, and more. The US already allows some of these, but other countries don and nobody allows patents for some of them.
There a way to re patent already known or previously patented stuff as long as you claim the stuff has a new use. The US also wants standards for granting patents to be relaxed a bit compared to many countries current requirements and patent terms to be made effectively longer by not counting cheap jerseys long delays between when the patent was first filed and when it was granted (which can take years in some cases) toward the total patent term. Some of these rules would require countries to install penalties like the US currently has, while others criminalize and penalize more severely than anyone currently does. Other countries oppose this.
Lemme know if you have any questions!
Edit: Yay, thanks for the gold! Also, edited wording and content a bit.
Here is a quick summary from what wholesale jerseys I can glean. I not a lawyer, so don hold me to it. I used the doc itself, press releases and Wikipedia to piece this together.
It first talks about what a trademark is, the use of it, well known marks.
Geographical Indication: does not count as a trademark, and you can’t falsely indicate an incorrect geographical origin. Temporary AKA temporary storage in electronic form. Currently we don’t have laws for this, meaning ISPs are not liable for infringement, nor transitory storage.
Parallel imports: Would be up to the rights holders. (Allowing for Harry Potter UK edition to be unofficially sold in the US legally, for example.)
EDIT 3 A more relevant use of this would be to outlaw Japanese imports of Anime and Manga that has not been released here, or to outlaw imported textbooks that are sold at a lower price in other countries. In the US it is currently 50 years.
Anti Circumvention: Like Cheap Jerseys for sale some US law, it would not require knowledge that you circumvented a technology measure to make you liable for infringement. It would also allow countries to outlaw anything that enabled or facilitated circumvention instead of "has the purpose of" circumvention. Circumvention is it’s own separate action. Right now it only cover sale, transfer, lease and rent. New addition may include streaming and hosting online. It’s pretty fuzzy and relates to cases which relate to cases I’ll see if I can update this.
Enforcement: It allows for statutory damages to be set up they don’t have to prove how much money they lost, they will set an amount for compensation and as a deterrent . They can also destroy any materials used to manufacture pirated/counterfeit goods. US only allows certain items to be destroyed ( ie. Molds or forms ect,) and only things that were used predominately for the manufacturing. (NOT A LAWYER, but they can take/ destroy anything you used to pirate, ie. your computer?)
Preliminary Injunctions: To be granted in 10 days, there is no need show irreparable harm.
(Typing at work, sorry for any mistakes)
EDIT 4 Additional Points (Also formatting)
A trademark can be a phrase, sign, sound or scent There is disagreement about this.
You can’t enforce a trademark that is the customary word for a good/service in the language it’s sold. (If your brand is the French word for cold water you can’t enforce that in France)
コメント